W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2001

Re: <PRE> tag

From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 16:26:55 -0700
Message-Id: <a05010406b6f946dc2d12@[10.0.1.12]>
To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
At 11:59 PM +0100 4/10/01, David Woolley wrote:
>Whilst I've not looked at the document in question, many legal documents
>are actually very good fits for HTML 2.0. [...]
>
>E.g. This is a very quick transcription of part of the articles of
>association (US = bye-laws?) of the company for the flats (US =
>condominium?) where I live, and which I did a few years ago:
>
>   37.
>      * (1) The office of a member of the Council shall be vacated-
>           + (A) If a receiving order is made against him or he makes any
>             arrangement or composition with his creditors.
>
>This was generated by:
>
>   <p>37.<ul><li>(1) The office of a member of the Council shall be vacated-
>
>   <ul>
>   <li>(A)  If a receiving order is made against him or he makes any 
>arrangement
>   or composition with his creditors.
>
>which, I believe, is a pretty accurate representation of the true
>structure, and is, I think HTML version 1.

Just wanted to pipe up and second the approach David describes
here as well!  Great example, David, especially as it is a -real-
example of how this can be done!

--Kynn
-- 
Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
http://www.kynn.com/
Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2001 19:32:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:54 GMT