W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2001

WCAG Guideline 11

From: Joel Sanda <joels@ecollege.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 11:08:02 -0600
Message-ID: <1F65B84ED796D3119307009027DE0A51077D61B5@PIKESPEAK>
To: "'w3c-wai-ig@w3.org'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
I know this has been hashed out in the past, and if I remember right the
list agreed, for the most part, that an accessible document successfully
regresses to the HTML 4.01/XHTML 1.0 specifications.

But, I'm unclear on the list's recommendations for adhering first to the
WCAG and then to the specifications for HTML and CSS. A site can meet WCAG
recommendations and not meet the HTML and CSS recommendations, but that is
obviously not advisable or even acceptable, in my opionion.

Given the rendering differences between Windows versions of Opera, Netscape
4.x, Netscape 6.x, and Internet Explorer 5.x, (not to mention the MacOS),
how much of an issue is it meeting the WCAG 1.0 recommendations and not
meeting the HTML/XHTML and CSS specifications?



Joel Sanda 
Quality Assurance Manager
p. 303.873.7400 x 3021
m 303.883.4468
f. 303.873.7449 
> "Educators Working for Educators"
Received on Monday, 9 April 2001 13:08:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:12 UTC