W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2001

Re: Skipping navigation tactics

From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2001 09:03:47 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <200104080803.f3883lW06484@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> What about switch for accessibility? For example the first home-page would
> ask the user if they

Because 99% of sites will never implement the accessible version.  That was
the real advantage of HTML (which has to a large extent been lost) that
it tended to produce accessibility without a conscious need to design
for accessiblity.  (Obviously conscious design helps, but few designers
are prepared/allowed to do that.)

Incidentally, in terms of HTML's aims the need for multiple sites or a
higher level master script tend to indicate a failure in the language.
In particular, any higher level master script ought to be what is sent
to the browser.
Received on Sunday, 8 April 2001 04:13:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:54 GMT