W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2000

Re: Slashdot: How should Govt sites be designed

From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@home.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 09:07:24 -0500
Message-ID: <008701c069c5$02e66020$2cf60141@mtgmry1.md.home.com>
To: "Pawley, Neil" <neil.pawley@ccta.gsi.gov.uk>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
about the summary.  if propperly done and supported, it gives the
auditory user the same implementative capabilities as the graphical
user has or nearly so.  if you don't want to use a summary, perhaps
there are forms other than table that could be used?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pawley, Neil" <neil.pawley@ccta.gsi.gov.uk>
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: December 19, 2000 8:17 AM
Subject: RE: Slashdot: How should Govt sites be designed


I am afraid that I am to blame for the open.gov.uk website.  It is my
and my implementation.

Firstly, I would very much like to thank everyone for their past
its great to get some quality feedback on what I am trying to do here.

I have made a number or corrections and changes in light of these

1. I have downgraded the WAI rating to a single A, until further
can be made to achieve a higher level.
2. I have also corrected the DOCTYPE so that the page now validates

I do have some concerns about introducing further graphics into the
My primary concerns have been reducing possible download speeds and
unnecessary eye candy graphics.  They are of little use to most people
even less use to the visually impaired.

If there is a way in which images can be used to aid usability I am
than willing to experiment.

I am also concerned about the WAI guidelines insistence on the SUMMARY
attribute for tables.  It seems like a good idea in principle but can
more of a hindrance in practice.  Browsers for the visually impaired
read out the contents of this attribute, which can be annoying and
inefficient if the contents of the table are text based and self
in themselves.  Explanations, however short, can just get in the way.
should we be duplicating information and handicapping the browsing
experience of precisely the users we are trying to assist.

An example would be the Organisational Index listing on the front
page.  The
title is textual and precise, the next line gives an explanation as to
purpose and the third presents the links to the relevant pages.  A
attribute is superfluous.  I have examined this at length with blind
institutions within the UK and their feelings are very similar to
mine.  If
anyone can help on this it would be much appreciated.

Once again, I would like to thank everyone for their contributions and
that there are many more comments to come.

neil pawley
internet development consultant
central computer & telecommunications agency
rosebery court, st andrews business park, norwich nr7 0hs
direct line :   +44 1603 704852
fax :   +44 1603 704817
gtn :   3040 4852
mobile :   0831 320813
email :   npawley@ccta.gov.uk

"I spent a lot of my money on booze, birds and fast cars.  The rest I
George Best
Received on Tuesday, 19 December 2000 09:07:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:10 UTC