W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2000

Suggestions for improved table?

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 10:54:44 -0500
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20001106104356.032ad8d0@rpcp.mit.edu>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
I know this table [1] stinks [2]. I could use TH as a start, but I also have 
a subheading of sorts (the type of algorithm) and I don't want to have to 
add a whole column for that semantic (I prefer one row). Any suggested 
alternative renditions?

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-xmldsig-core-20001031/#sec-AlgID
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-TECHS/#gl-table-markup

Forwarded Text ----
>Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 16:30:53 -0500
>From: Ken Goldman <kgold@watson.ibm.com>
>To: reagle@w3.org
>Subject: DSIG spec typos
>...
>Table in 6.1
>
>When I printed the spec, the Algorithm URI's were truncated due to the
>lines being too long.  This is probably a function of my browser, OS
>fonts, and printer.

http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-xmldsig-core-20001031/#sec-AlgID




__
Joseph Reagle Jr.
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Monday, 6 November 2000 10:54:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:50 GMT