W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2000

RE: A new iconography?

From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 20:56:50 -0700
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20001021205550.01f92350@garth.idyllmtn.com>
To: "Bailey, Bruce" <Bruce_Bailey@ed.gov>
Cc: "'Anne Pemberton'" <apembert@crosslink.net>, "'w3c-wai-ig@w3.org'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
At 08:04 AM 10/19/2000 , Bailey, Bruce wrote:
>Why are we debating this?  It seems black and white to me, but the popular
>response has been to suggest changing the guidelines rather than facing up
>to and acknowledging the problem.

The guideline as written says that if there is a suitable replacement,
then use it; if not, then use the images.  There is not a suitable
replacement at the moment (I know you refuse to believe this, but
it's true), so if you want it to be "black and white" then the guideline
as written needs to be changed.



-- 
Kynn Bartlett  <kynn@idyllmtn.com>                    http://kynn.com/
Director of Accessibility, Edapta               http://www.edapta.com/
Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain Internet   http://www.idyllmtn.com/
AWARE Center Director                      http://www.awarecenter.org/
What's on my bookshelf?                         http://kynn.com/books/
Received on Sunday, 22 October 2000 00:11:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:50 GMT