W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2000

Re: Is large print Accessibility?

From: David Poehlman <poehlman@clark.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 15:38:12 -0400
Message-ID: <39D8E424.A20AB43F@clark.net>
To: Dave J Woolley <david.woolley@bts.co.uk>
CC: "'w3c-wai-ig@w3.org'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
thanks dave.  I grow more annoyed every day with this strategy of making
it look best in ie.  take for instance the site below which claims to be
blind friendly but wants you to use ie5.01 or higher and take for
instance the comment I saw recently by one page tester who says bobby is
out of date because her pages are accessable but bobby fails them.
http://www.reelbooks.com
is the site I was pointing too here.  I know, I should change the
subject of this message.  while I am on it though, if you pul this site
up in lynx, it is blank because their comment tags are unbalanced I do
believe.
-- 
Hands-On Technolog(eye)s
ftp://poehlman.clark.net
http://poehlman.clark.net
mailto:poehlman@clark.net
voice 301-949-7599
end sig.
Received on Monday, 2 October 2000 15:35:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:50 GMT