W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 1999

RE: Web Accessibility Myths and The Kynn Challenge (was:

From: Neff, Robert <Robert.Neff@usmint.treas.gov>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 1999 15:12:03 -0400
Message-ID: <B1E68D292F3CD111A57C0000F67CB3CA0104412D@WDCSRV03.usmint.treas.gov>
To: "'jonathan chetwynd'" <jonathan@signbrowser.free-online.co.uk>, Scott Luebking <phoenixl@netcom.com>, charles@w3.org, mburks952@worldnet.att.net
Cc: kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Sorry, but I can think of more than one reason to NOT support multiple
browsers on an intranet.  Security is number one!  Design and rework is two
- CSS is not forgiving on multiple browsers and even within two versions of
the same browser.  Three - IT capitalization and cost to support.  Four -
the way plug-ins are handled...

		-----Original Message-----
		From:	jonathan chetwynd
[mailto:jonathan@signbrowser.free-online.co.uk]
		Sent:	Sunday, October 24, 1999 2:42 PM
		To:	Scott Luebking; charles@w3.org;
mburks952@worldnet.att.net
		Cc:	kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
		Subject:	Re: Web Accessibility Myths and The Kynn
Challenge (was:

		The reason to support more than one type of browser on an
intranet include:

		Good practice.

		---

		Special Needs within a corporation will require a different
browser.

		Our college has a number of systems, not surprisingly.

		Apple's are used by some different thinking types
apparently.

		Not all are networked, so some comms go via www.



		Jonathan Chetwynd
		jay@peepo.com

		Search the www with pictures at
		www.peepo.com

		Send us your links
		We value your comments
Received on Sunday, 24 October 1999 15:12:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:45 GMT