W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 1999

WAI IG CALL FOR REVIEW: New Authoring Tool Guidelines Working Draft

From: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 17:16:34 -0500
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990216171634.009a5100@localhost>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
WAI IG CALL FOR REVIEW: Authoring Tool Guidelines Working Draft
          
The Authoring Tool Guidelines Working Group (AUWG) has prepared a Working
Draft which they would like the WAI Interest Group to review before
publishing it as an updated version on the W3C Technical Reports page.
Please review the draft, dated February 16th
<http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/WD-WAI-AUTOOLS-19990216>. Comments are due by
February 23, 1999. Details follow.
          
TIMELINE FOR WAI IG REVIEW:
Please send comments by close of business US Eastern Standard Time, Tuesday,
February 23, 1999, at the latest. Earlier comments are greatly appreciated.
We will do our best to incorporate comments received by this deadline.
          
WHERE TO SEND COMMENTS:
Send comments to the <w3c-wai-au@w3.org> list. The AUWG mailing list is
archived from the AU home page <http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU> if you would like
to view other people's comments.
     
CHANGES:
Changes made to the last draft are summarized at
<http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/changes>.
The major difference is the inclusion of Techniques, which are suggested
techniques for implementing the Checkpoints.

REVIEW QUESTIONS:
Please address the following questions in reviewing this draft. Other
feedback is also welcome.

Specific questions for this draft:
1. Should the Techniques be associated with Guidelines (as in the current
draft), with Checkpoints, or with both?
2. Are there additional Guidelines, Checkpoints or Techniques which need to
be included?
3. Are the priorities of Checkpoints appropriate as indicated (priority
levels are defined within the document)?
4. Are there Checkpoints which should be Techniques, or Techniques which
should be Checkpoints?

General Questions for the document:
5. Is the document understandable and clear?
6. Does the format/structure of the document work well?
7. Is anything missing from the guidelines?

THANK YOU:
...for your time reviewing this material, and thanks to the Chairs, Editors
and Members of the Authoring Tool Guidelines Working Group who have been
developing this
draft.

QUESTIONS:
If you have any questions on this process, please contact the chair of the
group, Jutta Treviranus
<jutta.treviranus@utoronto.ca>, the W3C staff contact, Charles
McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, or Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>.

Thank you,

Judy


_________________________________________________________________________
Judy Brewer    jbrewer@w3.org    +1.617.258.9741    http://www.w3.org/WAI
Director,Web Accessibility Initiative(WAI), World Wide Web Consortium(W3C)

WAI Interest Group home page: http://www.w3.org/WAI/IG
Previous WAI IG Updates: http://www.w3.org/WAI/IG/Overview.html#Updates
Unsubscribe? Send "unsubscribe" subject line: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org
Questions? http://www.w3.org/WAI/IG/Overview.html#Uselist or wai@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 16 February 1999 17:16:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:43 GMT