W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 1999

Re: Define Accessibility!

From: Anne Pemberton <apembert@crosslink.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 14:59:22 -0400
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990611145922.00bdac20@apembert.pop.crosslink.net>
To: "WAI IG" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>""
At 01:14 PM 6/11/1999 -0400, Bruce Bailey wrote:
>We have really been debating about the definition of accessibility here. 
>Some are equating "accessible" with "understandable" and others with
>"available".  

When looking for a definition, a good starting place is a dictionary. My
handy Random House Webster's gives the definition of "accessible" as:

"1. Easy to approach, reach, enter, speak with, or use. 2. able to be used,
entered, or reached. 3. obtainable, attainable (accessible evidence). 4.
Readily understandable. 5. open to the influence of (accessible to bribary)."

Definition #4 is relevent to this discussion, and, at least in this
dictionary, the meaning of accessibility clearly includes understanding. In
my mind at least, there has never been a question that understanding is a
part of accessibility, and I have been quite surprised that understanding
is considered something other than a part of accessibility. 


				Anne




Anne L. Pemberton
http://www.pen.k12.va.us/Pav/Academy1
http://www.erols.com/stevepem/apembert
apembert@crosslink.net
Enabling Support Foundation
http://www.enabling.org
Received on Friday, 11 June 1999 14:51:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:44 GMT