W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 1999

Re: Debunking the need for "text-only" parallel sites

From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com>
Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 08:53:38 -0700
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990521085338.037318e0@mail.idyllmtn.com>
To: Brian Kelly <b.kelly@ukoln.ac.uk>
Cc: WAI IG <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
At 03:46 PM 5/21/1999 +0100, Brian Kelly wrote:
>I agree that a text-only representation of a web site shouldn't be
>automatically dismissed.  A paper at last year's WWW conference gave an
>example of providing a text-only version of resources which are intended to
>be indexed by robots.

What if the robot wants to index your images?

What excludes a well-done, nicely-degradable site from being
indexed by a robot the same as a text-only version?

--
Kynn Bartlett <kynn@hwg.org>
President, Governing Board Member
HTML Writers Guild <URL:http://www.hwg.org>
Director, Accessible Web Authoring Resources and Education Center
  <URL:http://aware.hwg.org/>
Received on Friday, 21 May 1999 12:01:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:43 GMT