- From: Jamal Mazrui <empower@smart.net>
- Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 18:16:01 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "John O'Rourke" <JOROURKE@fcc.gov>
- cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
I recommend HTML over RTF, which has less text conversion tools available . Regards, Jamal On Wed, 5 May 1999, John O'Rourke wrote: > Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 12:13:58 -0400 > From: John O'Rourke <JOROURKE@fcc.gov> > To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > Subject: opinions sought about RTF > Resent-Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 12:14:36 -0400 (EDT) > Resent-From: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > > Hi everyone, > > I am in the middle of providing the FCC with a full range of web accessibility options. Does anyone have opinions or ideas about the appropriate use of RTF? Better yet where is RTF outlined in the latest authoring guidelines? > > Regards, > > John O'Rourke > > >
Received on Wednesday, 5 May 1999 18:16:04 UTC