W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 1999

WAI IG CALL FOR REVIEW: Authoring Tool Guidelines Working Draft

From: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1999 00:06:45 -0500
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990402000645.00a3a530@localhost>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
WAI IG CALL FOR REVIEW: Authoring Tool Guidelines Working Draft

The Authoring Tool Guidelines Working Group (AUWG) has prepared a Working
Draft for WAI Interest Group review before publishing it as an updated
version on the W3C Technical Reports page. Please review the draft, dated
March 31th <http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/WAI-AUTOOLS-19990331>. 

Comments are due by April 8, 1999. Details follow.

TIMELINE FOR WAI IG REVIEW:
Please send comments by close of business US Eastern Standard Time,
Thursday, April 8, 1999. Earlier comments are greatly appreciated. We will
do our best to incorporate comments received by this deadline.

WHERE TO SEND COMMENTS:
Send comments to the <w3c-wai-au@w3.org> list. The AUWG mailing list is
archived from the AU home page <http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU> if you want to
view other people's comments.

CHANGES:
Changes made to the last draft are summarized at
<http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/changes>. Note that there have been two internal
working group drafts since the last public working draft, and in that time
the document has been substantially reordered and rewritten. Not all
checkpoints have priorities yet, and some are provisionally assigned.
Comments on prioritization are welcome.

REVIEW QUESTIONS:
Please address the following questions in reviewing this draft. Other
feedback is welcome.

Specific questions for this draft:
1. Are there additional Techniques which need to be included?
2. Given the definition of priority, are the priorities of Checkpoints
appropriate as indicated? Where no priority is indicated, suggested
priority (and rationale) is appreciated.
3. Are there Checkpoints which should be Techniques, or Techniques which
should be Checkpoints?

General Questions:
4. Is the document understandable and clear?
5. Does the format/structure of the document work well?
6. Is anything missing from the guidelines?

THANK YOU:
...for your time reviewing this material, and thanks to the Chairs, Editors
and Members of the AUWG who have been developing this draft.

QUESTIONS?
If you have questions on this process, please contact the Chair, Jutta
Treviranus <jutta.treviranus@utoronto.ca>, the W3C staff contact, Charles
McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, or Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>.

Thank you,

Judy

_________________________________________________________________________
Judy Brewer    jbrewer@w3.org    +1.617.258.9741    http://www.w3.org/WAI
Director,Web Accessibility Initiative(WAI), World Wide Web Consortium(W3C)

WAI Interest Group home page: http://www.w3.org/WAI/IG
Previous WAI IG Updates: http://www.w3.org/WAI/IG/Overview.html#Updates
Unsubscribe? Send "unsubscribe" subject line: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org
Questions? http://www.w3.org/WAI/IG/Overview.html#Uselist or wai@w3.org
Received on Friday, 2 April 1999 00:06:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:43 GMT