Regarding ThinkQuest, here's a couple of references: Learning from Learners, Internet Style Educom Review (March/April 1998) http://www.educause.edu/pub/er/review/reviewArticles/33214.html The website has accessibility issues: I sent a message to Thinkquest with a link to the WAI guidelines, CAST, and the Bobby analysis of their homepage: http://io.advanced.org/thinkquest/ Karl Hebenstreit, Jr. ____________________Reply Separator____________________ Subject: technology lag in school Author: "al gilman" <asgilman@access.digex.net> Date: 12/1/98 4:06 PM to follow up on what Claude Sweet said: > My background is in education and I can tell you that only in > universities are faculty and students provided with the latest > and greatest in computer and Internet technology. ... and Thomas Jefferson High School in Fairfax County, Inc... Did you see the results of the ThinkQuest awards? [snip] > ...I still have problems with convincing teachers that it is NOT > necessary to learn how to manually write html files for most > people who are concerned with producing product rather than the > process itself. I guess it is a carryover from the days of DOS > and the demeaning remarks of DOS computer users about people > who preferred the graphic user interface of the Macintosh or > Windows. It is an analytical religion that dates back to the revolution of Gutenberg, Newton and Leibnitz. The computer may have upset the apple-cart on this one -- I maybe don't want to know. The teachers are firmly into the paradigm that problem-solving is based on atomization, on analysis. The three R's are all calculi of little code tokens. Can you blame the teachers if there is a lot of inertia there? Just ask the teachers: How many people drive cars? How many people build cars? Put the history they are living in the context of the living that they recognize as history. AlReceived on Wednesday, 2 December 1998 11:45:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:40 GMT