W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 1998

RE: Re: Washington Post editoral: Claims Against Common Sense

From: Brumage_D <Brumage_D@BLS.GOV>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 10:54:08 -0500
Message-Id: <200E2FA22B2AD2119AC000104B6A0A8651A8FC@PSBMAIL1>
To: Lovey@aol.com
Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Well, I guess that depends on what you'd define as good. I have yet to
receive a reply to mine, although I sent as an Opinion Column
submission. As far as seeing whether or not any of our letters get
printed, this usually takes roughly a week and a half from what I've
seen.

David

> ----------
> From: 	Lovey@aol.com[SMTP:Lovey@aol.com]
> Sent: 	Thursday, November 19, 1998 5:44 PM
> To: 	w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org
> Cc: 	w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> Subject: 	Re:  Re: Washington Post editoral:  Claims Against
> Common Sense
> 
> I rec'd a reply.... is this good or bad?
> 
> In a message dated 11/19/98 3:46:32 PM, webnews@washpost.com wrote:
> >Dear Lovey@aol.com:
> >Thank you for your comments for William Raspberry.  I have forwarded
> your   
> >letter on to Mr. Raspberry for review.
> >Sincerely,
> >Michael Golden
> >Customer Care Representative
> >washingtonpost.com
> >E-mail: goldenm@washpost.com
> 
Received on Friday, 20 November 1998 10:51:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:40 GMT