W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 1998

Re: Symbols/Universal sign

From: Bruce Bailey <bbailey@clark.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 13:32:10 -0400
Message-ID: <3613BC9A.B808045A@clark.net>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
CC: Al Gilman <asgilman@access.digex.net>
Back on the 23rd I provided a link for more information about bliss:

Persons interested in this should learn about Blissymbolics, a
communication system originally Developed by Charles K. Bliss
(1897-1985) for
the purpose of international communication (think "League of Nations"
and you
will have an idea of how successful he was).  Bliss has fewer than one
primitives that can be combined into thousands of words.  Visit
Communication International for more information

Al Gilman wrote:

> to follow up on what Paolo Graziani said:
> > Why not Bliss symbols?
> >
> > They represent a well organized language, with a univocal meaning,
> > easily translatable into any other language.
> Why not follow up with some sort of a link or citation for more
> information on this?  Does anybody have a working translator _to_
> Bliss from any natural language?
> Al
> I am reading "univocal" to mean "unequivocal" -- no?
Received on Thursday, 1 October 1998 13:30:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:02 UTC