Re: Re: Symbols/Universal sign

to follow up on what Paolo Graziani said:

> Why not Bliss symbols?
> 
> They represent a well organized language, with a univocal meaning, 
> easily translatable into any other language.

Why not follow up with some sort of a link or citation for more
information on this?  Does anybody have a working translator _to_
Bliss from any natural language?

Al

I am reading "univocal" to mean "unequivocal" -- no?