W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 1998

Re: Re: Symbols/Universal sign

From: Al Gilman <asgilman@access.digex.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1998 11:08:46 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199810011508.LAA04933@access5.digex.net>
To: graziani@iroe.iroe.fi.cnr.it (Paolo Graziani)
Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
to follow up on what Paolo Graziani said:

> Why not Bliss symbols?
> 
> They represent a well organized language, with a univocal meaning, 
> easily translatable into any other language.

Why not follow up with some sort of a link or citation for more
information on this?  Does anybody have a working translator _to_
Bliss from any natural language?

Al

I am reading "univocal" to mean "unequivocal" -- no?
Received on Thursday, 1 October 1998 11:09:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:40 GMT