At 05:50 PM 8/10/98 +0200, Daniel Dardailler wrote: > >Kynn, it's not an issue of whether or not this is doable in software, >of course it is, this is an issue of how much it would cost Peter and >other blind users of this list to upgrade their sofware or read >through all the >>>, vs. having us follow a simple convention of >moving long >>> dialog at the end of our messages. However, that goes against long-running common practice of mailing list responses. When someone is answering two distinct portions of the message, it's more helpful to most readers that the response be organized in a logical manner: hence the quote, response, quote, response format. Ann --- Author of Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials Buy it online! http://www.webgeek.com/about.html Owner, WebGeek Communications http://www.webgeek.com Vice President-Finance, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org Pointgrrl, Central Coast WebgrrlsReceived on Monday, 10 August 1998 13:32:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:40 GMT