W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 1998

icons and tables

From: Sue Abbott <sue@skillzone.ltd.uk>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 11:30:46 +0100
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, "Weil, T.J." <t.weil@ic.ac.uk>
Cc: "Charles McCathieNevile" <charlesn@sunrise.srl.rmit.edu.au>, "O'Callaghan, L." <l.ocallaghan@ic.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <000d01bdba12$c85c1ee0$b4a7edc1@amaze>
Hello Dr Weil

That set of WebReview charts you pointed us to is extremely useful. I was
most disappointed to find that my newly-discovered "float" property, which
enabled me to position graphics without tables, turned out to be on the
"danger" list however!

Rats. Back to the drawing board...

The trend of the discussions on tables here seem to suggest it is acceptable
to use a table if the first column is a graphic with a properly tagged
hypertext link and the second column is the written description of the
destination. Going by the simulation Charles gave us, that would read okay
in a screen reader.

Do I have that right?

Sue

----------------------------------------------------------------
Sue Abbott
Skill Zone Ltd
P O Box 18
Runcorn WA7 4FN
Telephone 01928 775842
http://www.skillzone.ltd.uk
----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 28 July 1998 06:32:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:40 GMT