Len: "I haven't tried it yet. If anyone has, please tell us what you think." WL:: This is one of the best I've seen so far. It is IMHO more "accessible" than Bobby and furnishes the data in a very useful form. It is not tied into "our" guidelines but has a very focused array of analyses. I'm not sure if: "# of links that do not have a line break before or after the link." is all that important to "navigation"; if "# of horizontal lines across the Web page." *Really* affects "readability"; or whether "# of absolute links on the page." is a "maintainability" factor about which any action can be taken - if you gotta link, you gotta link. Insofar as accessibility in the disabilities sense goes, it is quick, useful, and I think an important weapon in our armamentarium. -- Love. ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE http://dicomp.pair.comReceived on Thursday, 4 June 1998 09:55:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 18:13:57 GMT