W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 1998

Re: The visual Web vs. seamless accessibility (was Re: RIT - Javascript)

From: David Poehlman <poehlman@clark.net>
Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 20:06:11 -0400 (EDT)
To: Lynn Alford <lynn.alford@jcu.edu.au>
cc: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.980504200453.5088A-100000@shell.clark.net>
well, perhaps we should consess a bit with the use of shading then.  make
it just a little less dark than the background or perhaps a bit more dark
than a light background.
the problem I have is with printing the things.


On Tue, 5 May 1998, Lynn Alford wrote:

> At 6:38 PM -0400 4/5/98, David Poehlman wrote:
> >for an aural text, black on black is nice.
> 
> I think blind readers have strong opinions about people who 'hide' keywords
> on their site by setting the text colour to the background colour so they
> can have multiple "recreation, holiday, recreational holidays..." on their
> page.  Which is a frequent use of black on black or white on white.
> 
> Lynn
> 
> lynn.alford@jcu.edu.au  | More of your conversation would infect
> lalford@nyx.net         | my brain.  Coriolanus
> Flexible Learning Unit  | http://www.jcu.edu.au/~imla/
> Game Review pages based at http://www.jcu.edu.au/~imla/games2.html
> 
> 

Hands-On-Technolog(eye)s
touching the internet
voice: 1-(301) 949-7599
poehlman@clark.net
ftp://ftp.clark.net/pub/poehlman
http://www.clark.net/pub/poehlman
Received on Monday, 4 May 1998 20:06:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:39 GMT