Re: Most common new WCAG 2.1 issues found

+1, in all our experience with WCAG 2.1 , non text color contrast is the
most used SC..

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 6:30 PM John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com> wrote:

> +1, and I'll add that contrary to the perspective of some, native tab
> focus on a customized backgrounds should be failing as well when the
> contrast is insufficient.
>
> http://john.foliot.ca/demos/focuscolor.html
>
> JF
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 7:37 AM, Denis Boudreau <denis.boudreau@deque.com>
> wrote:
>
>> While that may be true Patrick, based on my own experience assessing
>> websites, I would have guess that insufficient non-text color contrast
>> would be the most frequent kind of 2.1 issue as well. This stuff has been
>> everywhere for as long as I can remember.
>>
>> /Denis
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 08:29 Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'd caution as well that there's likely still a high degree of
>>> uncertainty around how to test, what actually counts as a pass/fail,
>>> what something does/doesn't apply to. Something that will even out over
>>> time, no doubt...but for many auditors, this is uncharted territory
>>> until they get more familiar with spotting common patterns of failure
>>> etc.
>>>
>>> P
>>>
>>> On 20/08/2018 12:01, Alastair Campbell wrote:
>>> > Hi everyone,
>>> >
>>> > A little aneq-data-point, I asked on Twitter what people were finding
>>> > came up most in WCAG 2.1 audits from the new criteria:
>>> >
>>> > https://twitter.com/alastc/status/1030455692853952512
>>> >
>>> > Non-text contrast (on inputs / focus styles) came up the most for most
>>> > people. On a per-instance basis that isn’t too surprising, search
>>> boxes
>>> > are often on every page.
>>> >
>>> > I’m not sure there is anything to conclude from this, but if we start
>>> > seeing people act on that more often, perhaps it is moving the needle.
>>> >
>>> > Kind regards,
>>> >
>>> > -Alastair
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> >
>>> > www.nomensa.com <http://www.nomensa.com/>
>>> > tel: +44 (0)117 929 7333 / 07970 879 653
>>> > follow us: @we_are_nomensa or me: @alastc
>>> > Nomensa Ltd. King William House, 13 Queen Square, Bristol BS1 4NT
>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=13+Queen+Square,+Bristol+BS1+4NT&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>> >
>>> > Company number: 4214477 | UK VAT registration: GB 771727411
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> Patrick H. Lauke
>>>
>>> www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
>>> http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
>>> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
>>>
>>> --
>> /Denis
>>
>> --
>> Denis Boudreau
>> Principal SME & trainer
>> Web accessibility, inclusive design and UX
>> Deque Systems inc.
>> 514-730-9168
>>
>> Keep in touch: @dboudreau
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *John Foliot* | Principal Accessibility Strategist
>
> Deque Systems - Accessibility for Good
>
> deque.com
>
>

-- 
Satya Jaya Aparna Pasi
CPACC Professional | Team Accessibility Lead
Deque Software
aparna.pasi@deque.com | +91-7093400949
"Accessibility is a feature not an option"

Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2018 10:37:12 UTC