W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2018

RE: Proposed editorial errata for WCAG 2.1

From: Ku, Jaeun <jku@illinois.edu>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 19:58:44 +0000
To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
CC: AG WG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <ACF35B439B891E408A70DF1C1D1D0F1B39850B59@CITESMBX6.ad.uillinois.edu>
+1

Each item sounds reasonable. 

JaEun Jemma Ku, PhD
Internet Applications Systems Specialist
University library
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
424 Library, M/C 522
1408 West Gregory Dr.
Urbana, IL 61801
1-217-244-2145
jku@illinois.edu
https://a11yfirst.library.illinois.edu/





-----Original Message-----
From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2018 2:49 PM
To: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
Cc: AG WG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Proposed editorial errata for WCAG 2.1

+1

Laura

On 7/24/18, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org> wrote:
> Based on recent changes in the editors' draft, I would add the 
> following to the editorial errata in 
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/errata/ if approved by the WG:
>
>   * In the Introduction <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#intro>, several
>     (but not all) references to "WCAG 2.0" should be "WCAG 2.1".
>   * In the 0.5.2 Numbering in WCAG 2.1
>     <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#numbering-in-wcag-2-1>, the words
>     "critera" and "ccriteria" should be "criteria".
>   * In Success Criterion 1.4.10 Reflow
>     <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#reflow>, the first note had a
>     supernumary "Note" indicator which should be removed.
>   * In 5.3.1 Required Components of a Conformance Claim
>     <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#conformance-required> the editorial
>     note "In WCAG 2.0 this was a dated URI, which may need to be
>     adjusted when this becomes a Rec." should be removed.
>   * In the definition for keyboard interface
>     <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#dfn-keyboard-interface>, the second
>     (of three) note should be an example of the first note, leaving only
>     two actual notes.
>   * In the definition for technology
>     <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#dfn-technologies>, the third note
>     should instead be an example.
>   * In 7. Input Purposes for User Interface Components
>     <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#input-purposes>, the word "county"
>     should be "country".
>
> A diff of the changes between the Rec version and current editors'
> draft, showing these changes, can be seen at 
> https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Flabs.w3.org%2Fspec-generator%2F%3Ftype%3Drespec%26url%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Frawgit.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag%2F21e2c0578b7512b051baea0b24c924e324fb23d4%2Fguidelines%2Findex.html&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Flabs.w3.org%2Fspec-generator%2F%3Ftype%3Drespec%26url%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Frawgit.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag%2Fd4dcc48d176aa33db1c6bee66e0e0188c5acb114%2Fguidelines%2Findex.html.
>
> Michael
>
>


--
Laura L. Carlson

Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2018 19:59:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 24 July 2018 19:59:09 UTC