Proposed editorial errata for WCAG 2.1

Based on recent changes in the editors' draft, I would add the following 
to the editorial errata in https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/errata/ if 
approved by the WG:

  * In the Introduction <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#intro>, several
    (but not all) references to "WCAG 2.0" should be "WCAG 2.1".
  * In the 0.5.2 Numbering in WCAG 2.1
    <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#numbering-in-wcag-2-1>, the words
    "critera" and "ccriteria" should be "criteria".
  * In Success Criterion 1.4.10 Reflow
    <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#reflow>, the first note had a
    supernumary "Note" indicator which should be removed.
  * In 5.3.1 Required Components of a Conformance Claim
    <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#conformance-required> the editorial
    note "In WCAG 2.0 this was a dated URI, which may need to be
    adjusted when this becomes a Rec." should be removed.
  * In the definition for keyboard interface
    <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#dfn-keyboard-interface>, the second
    (of three) note should be an example of the first note, leaving only
    two actual notes.
  * In the definition for technology
    <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#dfn-technologies>, the third note
    should instead be an example.
  * In 7. Input Purposes for User Interface Components
    <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#input-purposes>, the word "county"
    should be "country".

A diff of the changes between the Rec version and current editors' 
draft, showing these changes, can be seen at 
https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Flabs.w3.org%2Fspec-generator%2F%3Ftype%3Drespec%26url%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Frawgit.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag%2F21e2c0578b7512b051baea0b24c924e324fb23d4%2Fguidelines%2Findex.html&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Flabs.w3.org%2Fspec-generator%2F%3Ftype%3Drespec%26url%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Frawgit.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag%2Fd4dcc48d176aa33db1c6bee66e0e0188c5acb114%2Fguidelines%2Findex.html.

Michael