W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2018

Re: What to work on next

From: Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 16:21:57 -0400
Message-ID: <CAEy-OxHw6fms9ZGsU4E4V=BVhGrRup1j99M8CF30rUbJ3O_+fQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: David MacDonald <david@can-adapt.com>
Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I am probably with you on this David. We need to work carefully and
thoughtfully on what comes next, with quality and user needs as its core.

** katie **

*Katie Haritos-Shea*

*Principal ICT Accessibility Architect, **Board Member and W3C Advisory
Committee Rep for Knowbility *

*WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA/QA/FinServ/FinTech/Privacy,* *IAAP CPACC+WAS = *
*CPWA* <http://www.accessibilityassociation.org/cpwacertificants>

*Cell: **703-371-5545 <703-371-5545>** |* *ryladog@gmail.com
<ryladog@gmail.com>* *| **Oakton, VA **|* *LinkedIn Profile
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/>*

People may forget exactly what it was that you said or did,
but people will never forget how you made them feel.......

Our scars remind us of where we have been........they do not have to
dictate where we are going.


On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:00 PM, David MacDonald <david@can-adapt.com> wrote:

> As I know I don't think we've made a decision about what were working on
> next. It could be 2.2 or it could be silver.
>
> My thinking at this point  is that it might be best to go directly to
> Silver. Here's my reasoning:
>
>    - Currently in the 2.1 and 2.2 series we are basically locked into
>    backwards compatibility constraints. The trouble we had getting new
>    requirements into 2.1 will be repeated in 2.2. There are not a lot of
>    issues that we tabled for 2.2 that we can successfully address any better
>    than we could in 2.1. Perhaps we could do some more work on target size and
>    a couple of things like that but it doesn't sound like we can do much more
>    Until new assistive technologies come out or new specifications for
>    instance for COGA.
>    - Currently silver is under development and many of us could
>    contribute to that effort if we weren't working on another interim version
>    of WCAG. I think it would be better if we consolidate our efforts and work
>    on the same next big problem which is fleshing out the plausibility of
>    "measurability"  versus " testability"  and seeing if this is a viable
>    way forward for the standard .
>    - I'd be more comfortable if we were all working together on the
>    problem rather than in tandem where most of us can't give it more than a
>    passing glance to what's going on with silver because we have our heads
>    down on the current version.
>
> I'm interested in other people's opinions.
>
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>
>
>
> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
> Mobile:  613.806.9005
>
> LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>
> twitter.com/davidmacd
>
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>
> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>
>
>
> *  Adapting the web to all users*
> *            Including those with disabilities*
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>
Received on Monday, 9 July 2018 20:22:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 9 July 2018 20:22:22 UTC