Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation

Mike, seems to have been a blip – it is up and running for me now.

Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe

akirkpat@adobe.com
http://twitter.com/awkawk


From: Mike Elledge <melledge@yahoo.com>
Date: Thursday, January 25, 2018 at 12:59
To: "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org>, "Repsher, Stephen J" <stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
Subject: Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation

Thanks, Andrew.

On Thursday, January 25, 2018, 12:49:12 PM EST, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote:



I’ll check Mike. You can also reply to the CFC on the list if necessary.



Thanks,

AWK



Andrew Kirkpatrick

Group Product Manager, Accessibility

Adobe



akirkpat@adobe.com

http://twitter.com/awkawk




From: Mike Elledge <melledge@yahoo.com>
Date: Thursday, January 25, 2018 at 12:44
To: "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org>, "Repsher, Stephen J" <stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
Subject: Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation



Hi All--



Anyone else having trouble accessing the proposal? The name/password box keeps popping up after entering signon info.



Mike



On Tuesday, January 23, 2018, 4:40:40 PM EST, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote:





Jason,

You may be seeing a cached version. Try refreshing…



Thanks,

AWK



Andrew Kirkpatrick

Group Product Manager, Accessibility

Adobe



akirkpat@adobe.com

http://twitter.com/awkawk



From: "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org>
Date: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 at 14:56
To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, "Repsher, Stephen J" <stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: RE: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation



At least when I read it using my software combination here, the draft at http://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/Jan_2018_CR/guidelines/index.html


incorrectly shows most (all?) of the new WCAG 2.1 success criteria to be “at risk”, whereas the Appendix properly identifies the three SCs that the working group decided at the meeting today should be considered “at risk”.



From: Andrew Kirkpatrick [mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 2:38 PM
To: Repsher, Stephen J <stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com>; WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation



Thanks. Fixed.



Thanks,

AWK



Andrew Kirkpatrick

Group Product Manager, Accessibility

Adobe



akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>

http://twitter.com/awkawk<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7C0042e773a1bd4e9d4caa08d5629b6ff7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636523342165500677&sdata=dHqI%2Fb1TbMp2pIH01dfViDflvbLnqsVFbnL65nr2i0M%3D&reserved=0>



From: "Repsher, Stephen J" <stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com<mailto:stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com>>
Date: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 at 14:24
To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Subject: RE: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation



Andrew,



I believe the first radio option for the Target Size question is incorrect.  It should read:



“If the changes to the Target Size (AAA) SC fail consensus from the first survey item, I can live with the draft that includes the At Risk items and the Target Size (AAA) SC text from the December Working Draft.”



It should say fail, not pass (and also fixes “are result”).



Steve



From: Andrew Kirkpatrick [mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 1:24 PM
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Subject: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation
Importance: High



Call For Consensus — ends Thursday January 25th at 1:20pm Boston time.



Please respond to this CFC through this survey: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/Updated_CR_pub/<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2002%2F09%2Fwbs%2F35422%2FUpdated_CR_pub%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7Cd5465b7e14e74a298a6908d56296e9f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636523322673905992&sdata=qxRv2gQNtJ9P81HaYB0E0P5%2BMnwecxRge0TH25oyS10%3D&reserved=0>



If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know in the survey before the CfC deadline.



Thanks,

AWK



Andrew Kirkpatrick

Group Product Manager, Accessibility

Adobe



akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>

http://twitter.com/awkawk<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7C%7C54093524ef264326424008d51cd66c05%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636446629619786436&sdata=c5UP0xiniJIppvd6Esu1XA%2FbX1ykpABkhgCCmBp%2Fht8%3D&reserved=0>







________________________________
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Thank you for your compliance.
________________________________