- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 15:52:03 +0000
- To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
On 16/01/2018 15:47, David MacDonald wrote: > > How? Machine learning? > > We've been hearing about mapping documents for months and never seen > one... that's what I'm talking about... I've not been following this closely, admittedly, but: 1) there needs to be one true set of unambiguous tokens that define different purposes (so that ATs/UAs/extensions know which exact "common purpose" a particular thing serves); 2) surely when people here talk about "mapping" they mean "whatever the host language uses in terms of its own unambiguous token mechanisms, and how these translate 1-to-1 to the tokens for purpose proposed in 1)" > Anyway... I'm ready to drop AccName being sufficient and tell everyone > to use autofill... but I know there will be a lot of authors and their > companies bummed out to have to do that on a bunch of forms that have a > programmatically determinable obvious name. Define "obvious name", in a way that is always unambiguous, to all ATs/UAs/extensions, in all possible languages. Without proposing a restricted set of token values. P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:52:31 UTC