Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues

Hi Jason,

Sorta yes, sorta no. Can you provide an example of a "common"
contenteditable region? It occurs to me that whenever used, it is for
non-common purposes, and thus out of scope by that very nature.

JF

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:45 AM, White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote:

> One of those matters to worry about is that we don’t have effective ways
> of implementing it for text fields which are not implemented as HTML form
> controls (e.g., contenteditable).
>
>
>
> *From:* David MacDonald [mailto:david100@sympatico.ca]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 10, 2018 12:43 PM
> *To:* Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
> *Cc:* White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org>; WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues
>
>
>
> I'm OK with removing all non-html 5 autofill purposes and marking the SC
> at risk awaiting implementation of AT that can make use of this during CR.
>
> But I kind of feel like the engineers who hold their breath as the Space
> Shuttle takes off, knowing that there are things to worry about.
>
>
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>
>
>
> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
>
> Tel:  613.235.4902 <(613)%20235-4902>
>
> LinkedIn
>
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Fdavidmacdonald100&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C07c5c0e75ecb41facfb308d558518cfc%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636512029640596068&sdata=0udQ9kyaG17Sr6QeW0Yu5b1w8g%2BYiiJn4IpTI0Mt1g8%3D&reserved=0>
>
> twitter.com/davidmacd
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fdavidmacd&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C07c5c0e75ecb41facfb308d558518cfc%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636512029640596068&sdata=yShQW1Zo2lWWRpjEHPXkousrHJcL68BpJZQyNNS80YA%3D&reserved=0>
>
> GitHub
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FDavidMacDonald&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C07c5c0e75ecb41facfb308d558518cfc%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636512029640596068&sdata=j3iAXvA11FQ8WDKBfB%2B2pD9Eyb1VqW936wNhHULTGqU%3D&reserved=0>
>
> www.Can-Adapt.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.can-adapt.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C07c5c0e75ecb41facfb308d558518cfc%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636512029640596068&sdata=8%2FZU5%2FBSo%2BERCdi7gFsboAUGH6BsaqNxIEWkFx9Bpkc%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
> *  Adapting the web to all users*
>
> *            Including those with disabilities*
>
>
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidmacd.com%2Fdisclaimer.html&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C07c5c0e75ecb41facfb308d558518cfc%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636512029640596068&sdata=bfiPcM8HeGMlQyx7GcBbLXzn%2FzqNfdmh1rGb3kcAGMk%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 9:59 AM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
> wrote:
>
> Jason wrote:
>
> > if implementations are expected to emerge during the CR period, mark it
> as “at risk”.
>
>
>
> I believe they are, so that is what I suggested.
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom
> it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail
> in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or
> take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete
> it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
>
> Thank you for your compliance.
> ------------------------------
>



-- 
John Foliot
Principal Accessibility Strategist
Deque Systems Inc.
john.foliot@deque.com

Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion