Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1?

+1

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 7:56 PM, Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +++++++1 to all of this!
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 7:36 PM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Michael, (and everyone, question at the end)
>>
>>
>>
>> Just to pick up the conversation after the call, where you said:
>>
>>
>>
>> > The advantages are obvious: the reader gains an immediate
>> understanding of what they doing (mine) and why (Glenda's), which is often
>> not the case from the SC language.
>>
>>
>>
>> For consistency with the 2.0 docs I think your suggested summary
>> statements make sense as the first sentence if you pre-pend them with “The
>> intent of this Success Criterion (SC) is to…”
>>
>>
>>
>> It would be a useful “polishing” exercise once we’ve got the major
>> drafting & reviews done, I’d rather not interrupt that momentum by making
>> changes across the various branches just yet.
>>
>>
>>
>> I’ve added an issue for tracking, all going well, something to tackle
>> next week:
>>
>> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/882
>>
>>
>>
>> As Andrew said, there was general agreement to adding the personas to the
>> understanding documents (perhaps with hesitation about the number of
>> updates involved?).
>>
>>
>>
>> As Glenda has taken that on (with help), is everyone happy with the
>> location and format suggested? Taking Laura’s as example:
>>
>> https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/text-spacing/understanding/21/
>> text-spacing.html
>>
>>
>>
>> Something short  & snappy like that seems appropriate, with a consistent
>> format across the docs. Perhaps with one name only, rather than two names
>> associated with one quote?
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>
>>
>> -Alastair
>>
>>
>>
>

Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2018 05:44:28 UTC