Re: Plea for help with testing

On 04/04/2018 2:05 PM, David MacDonald wrote:
> Hi Andrew
>
> Here's the testing for our website
>
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG21/CR/evaluation_results_site_summary?implementation_id=154
>
> Everything is either a pass or N/A from Detlev and Alastair but it 
> says "Partial AA Conformance"
That's just a bug in the tool I thought I had fixed. I'll look again at 
it, but don't worry, it's not based on evaluation results. Michael
> Am I missing something? There are a few old comments that perhaps 
> Detlev can remove since they were addressed but I see no failures in 
> the Canonical column.
>
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>
> *Can**Adapt**Solutions Inc.*
>
> Tel:  613.235.4902
>
> LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>
> twitter.com/davidmacd <http://twitter.com/davidmacd>
>
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>
> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>
> /  Adapting the web to *all* users/
>
> /            Including those with disabilities/
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy 
> policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 11:36 AM, Laura Carlson 
> <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com <mailto:laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Andrew,
>
>     Agree with David that on the Nomensa site, the yellow (FAE619) buttons
>     have insufficient contrast with white background. It is 1.3:1
>     Screenshot of one of the buttons:
>     http://www.d.umn.edu/~lcarlson/wcagwg/2.1_implementations/nomensa-non-text-contrast.png
>     <http://www.d.umn.edu/%7Elcarlson/wcagwg/2.1_implementations/nomensa-non-text-contrast.png>
>
>     Evaluation results so far for Nomensa:
>     https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG21/CR/evaluation_results_site_summary?implementation_id=99
>     <https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG21/CR/evaluation_results_site_summary?implementation_id=99>
>
>     Kindest Regards,
>     Laura
>
>     On 4/4/18, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca
>     <mailto:david100@sympatico.ca>> wrote:
>     >    1. CanAdapt has been evaluated... there were a few minor
>     issues which
>     >    were addressed and it's ready to go ... you can ask Detlev and Alastair
>     > for
>     >    confirmation.
>     >    2. Nomensa has been evaluated by myself and Laura, there are
>     several
>     >    outstanding issues (Google embedded map has some issues, and a button
>     > style
>     >    has to be changed for contrast) There is also another issue
>     around audio
>     >    description that I think I'd like another opinion on. It's a
>     promo video
>     >    which is about a minute and 1/2 long, which has music in the
>     background
>     > and
>     >    text and pictures and video. Technically it's timed media
>     because it has
>     > an
>     >    audio track and the video track. There is a description below
>     it with
>     > all
>     >    of the text. Technically, it seems like it needs an audio
>     description
>     >    track, but practically speaking this would not add much to the
>     > experience
>     >    for blind user. If anybody can justify passing it I'm all
>     ears. It is
>     > here
>     > https://www.nomensa.com/ the heading that says great design starts
>     >    here. If the Google Maps and video are removed temporarily
>     and the
>     > button
>     >    contrast is changed it will be ready to go. I'm also open to
>     a wider
>     >    discussion about the video in hopes of finding a rationale to
>     pass it.
>     >
>     >
>     > Cheers,
>     > David MacDonald
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
>     >
>     > Tel:  613.235.4902
>     >
>     > LinkedIn
>     > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100
>     <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>>
>     >
>     > twitter.com/davidmacd <http://twitter.com/davidmacd>
>     >
>     > GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald
>     <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>>
>     >
>     > www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.Can-Adapt.com>
>     <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > *  Adapting the web to all users*
>     > *            Including those with disabilities*
>     >
>     > If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy
>     policy
>     > <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html
>     <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>>
>     >
>     > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 9:59 AM, Andrew Kirkpatrick
>     <akirkpat@adobe.com <mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>>
>     > wrote:
>     >
>     >> AGWG’ers,
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> We are officially down to the wire, and we are in great shape
>     for the
>     >> implementations for individual success criteria, but not as
>     great shape
>     >> for
>     >> the full site conformance.
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> Here’s the scorecard:
>     https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG21/CR/scorecard
>     <https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG21/CR/scorecard>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> We need two examples of pages that meet each success criteria,
>     and we
>     >> essentially have that. I’m not worried about this part.
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> We also need 8 web sites that conform at the AA level and 2 web
>     sites
>     >> that
>     >> conform at the AAA level (and two independent evaluations that
>     confirm
>     >> that).  Right now we have 1 site that meets AA and none that
>     meet AAA.
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> We do have one AAA in the works and interest by the owner to
>     fix the
>     >> issues that we identified, but need another person to evaluate
>     that site.
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> Here’s a run-down of what we need:
>     >>
>     >> AA
>     >>
>     >>    - 3-5 sites that meet at the AA level. A “site” needs to be
>     5 pages
>     >>    minimum (and for testing purposes it is ideal to have it not be much
>     >>    larger). These can be sites found in the wild or
>     demonstration sites,
>     >> but
>     >>    they need a public URI and need to be available through June.
>     >>    - Another evaluator for Knowbility
>     >>    - Another evaluator for A11yrules
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> AAA
>     >>
>     >>    - 1-2 sites that meet at the AAA level. A “site” needs to be
>     5 pages
>     >>    minimum (and for testing purposes it is ideal to have it not be much
>     >>    larger). These can be sites found in the wild or
>     demonstration sites,
>     >> but
>     >>    they need a public URI and need to be available through June.
>     >>    - Another 1-2 evaluators for lflegal.com <http://lflegal.com>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> Implementations link:
>     https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG21/CR/implementations
>     <https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG21/CR/implementations>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> Found a site that looks promising? Submit it here (
>     >> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG21/CR/select_site
>     <https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG21/CR/select_site>) and start
>     evaluating it!
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> *We need to have 8 sites at AA and 2 at AAA, tested and
>     confirmed to meet
>     >> that conformance level by at least two people by Tuesday morning if we
>     >> are
>     >> to keep on schedule.*
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> Thanks,
>     >>
>     >> AWK
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>     >>
>     >> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
>     >>
>     >> Adobe
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> akirkpat@adobe.com <mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
>     >>
>     >> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>     >>
>     >
>
>
>     --
>     Laura L. Carlson
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2018 18:11:30 UTC