Re: Plea for help with testing

Hi Andrew

Here's the testing for our website

https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG21/CR/evaluation_results_site_summary?implementation_id=154

Everything is either a pass or N/A from Detlev and Alastair but it says
"Partial AA Conformance" Am I missing something? There are a few old
comments that perhaps Detlev can remove since they were addressed but I see
no failures in the Canonical column.

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 11:36 AM, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
>
> Agree with David that on the Nomensa site, the yellow (FAE619) buttons
> have insufficient contrast with white background. It is 1.3:1
> Screenshot of one of the buttons:
> http://www.d.umn.edu/~lcarlson/wcagwg/2.1_implementations/nomensa-non-
> text-contrast.png
>
> Evaluation results so far for Nomensa:
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG21/CR/evaluation_results_
> site_summary?implementation_id=99
>
> Kindest Regards,
> Laura
>
> On 4/4/18, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> >    1. CanAdapt has been evaluated... there were a few minor issues which
> >    were addressed and it's ready to go ... you can ask Detlev and
> Alastair
> > for
> >    confirmation.
> >    2. Nomensa has been evaluated by myself and Laura, there are several
> >    outstanding issues (Google embedded map has some issues, and a button
> > style
> >    has to be changed for contrast) There is also another issue around
> audio
> >    description that I think I'd like another opinion on. It's a promo
> video
> >    which is about a minute and 1/2 long, which has music in the
> background
> > and
> >    text and pictures and video. Technically it's timed media because it
> has
> > an
> >    audio track and the video track. There is a description below it with
> > all
> >    of the text. Technically, it seems like it needs an audio description
> >    track, but practically speaking this would not add much to the
> > experience
> >    for blind user. If anybody can justify passing it I'm all ears. It is
> > here
> >    https://www.nomensa.com/ the heading that says great design starts
> >    here. If the Google Maps and video are removed temporarily and the
> > button
> >    contrast is changed it will be ready to go. I'm also open to a wider
> >    discussion about the video in hopes of finding a rationale to pass it.
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > David MacDonald
> >
> >
> >
> > *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
> >
> > Tel:  613.235.4902
> >
> > LinkedIn
> > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
> >
> > twitter.com/davidmacd
> >
> > GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
> >
> > www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
> >
> >
> >
> > *  Adapting the web to all users*
> > *            Including those with disabilities*
> >
> > If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> > <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 9:59 AM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> AGWG’ers,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> We are officially down to the wire, and we are in great shape for the
> >> implementations for individual success criteria, but not as great shape
> >> for
> >> the full site conformance.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Here’s the scorecard: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG21/CR/scorecard
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> We need two examples of pages that meet each success criteria, and we
> >> essentially have that. I’m not worried about this part.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> We also need 8 web sites that conform at the AA level and 2 web sites
> >> that
> >> conform at the AAA level (and two independent evaluations that confirm
> >> that).  Right now we have 1 site that meets AA and none that meet AAA.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> We do have one AAA in the works and interest by the owner to fix the
> >> issues that we identified, but need another person to evaluate that
> site.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Here’s a run-down of what we need:
> >>
> >> AA
> >>
> >>    - 3-5 sites that meet at the AA level. A “site” needs to be 5 pages
> >>    minimum (and for testing purposes it is ideal to have it not be much
> >>    larger). These can be sites found in the wild or demonstration sites,
> >> but
> >>    they need a public URI and need to be available through June.
> >>    - Another evaluator for Knowbility
> >>    - Another evaluator for A11yrules
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> AAA
> >>
> >>    - 1-2 sites that meet at the AAA level. A “site” needs to be 5 pages
> >>    minimum (and for testing purposes it is ideal to have it not be much
> >>    larger). These can be sites found in the wild or demonstration sites,
> >> but
> >>    they need a public URI and need to be available through June.
> >>    - Another 1-2 evaluators for lflegal.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Implementations link: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/
> WCAG21/CR/implementations
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Found a site that looks promising? Submit it here (
> >> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG21/CR/select_site) and start evaluating
> it!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> *We need to have 8 sites at AA and 2 at AAA, tested and confirmed to
> meet
> >> that conformance level by at least two people by Tuesday morning if we
> >> are
> >> to keep on schedule.*
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> AWK
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> >>
> >> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
> >>
> >> Adobe
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> akirkpat@adobe.com
> >>
> >> http://twitter.com/awkawk
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Laura L. Carlson
>