- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 10:36:46 -0500
- To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
Hi Andrew, Agree with David that on the Nomensa site, the yellow (FAE619) buttons have insufficient contrast with white background. It is 1.3:1 Screenshot of one of the buttons: http://www.d.umn.edu/~lcarlson/wcagwg/2.1_implementations/nomensa-non-text-contrast.png Evaluation results so far for Nomensa: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG21/CR/evaluation_results_site_summary?implementation_id=99 Kindest Regards, Laura On 4/4/18, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> wrote: > 1. CanAdapt has been evaluated... there were a few minor issues which > were addressed and it's ready to go ... you can ask Detlev and Alastair > for > confirmation. > 2. Nomensa has been evaluated by myself and Laura, there are several > outstanding issues (Google embedded map has some issues, and a button > style > has to be changed for contrast) There is also another issue around audio > description that I think I'd like another opinion on. It's a promo video > which is about a minute and 1/2 long, which has music in the background > and > text and pictures and video. Technically it's timed media because it has > an > audio track and the video track. There is a description below it with > all > of the text. Technically, it seems like it needs an audio description > track, but practically speaking this would not add much to the > experience > for blind user. If anybody can justify passing it I'm all ears. It is > here > https://www.nomensa.com/ the heading that says great design starts > here. If the Google Maps and video are removed temporarily and the > button > contrast is changed it will be ready to go. I'm also open to a wider > discussion about the video in hopes of finding a rationale to pass it. > > > Cheers, > David MacDonald > > > > *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* > > Tel: 613.235.4902 > > LinkedIn > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> > > twitter.com/davidmacd > > GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> > > www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> > > > > * Adapting the web to all users* > * Including those with disabilities* > > If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy > <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 9:59 AM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> > wrote: > >> AGWG’ers, >> >> >> >> We are officially down to the wire, and we are in great shape for the >> implementations for individual success criteria, but not as great shape >> for >> the full site conformance. >> >> >> >> Here’s the scorecard: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG21/CR/scorecard >> >> >> >> We need two examples of pages that meet each success criteria, and we >> essentially have that. I’m not worried about this part. >> >> >> >> We also need 8 web sites that conform at the AA level and 2 web sites >> that >> conform at the AAA level (and two independent evaluations that confirm >> that). Right now we have 1 site that meets AA and none that meet AAA. >> >> >> >> We do have one AAA in the works and interest by the owner to fix the >> issues that we identified, but need another person to evaluate that site. >> >> >> >> Here’s a run-down of what we need: >> >> AA >> >> - 3-5 sites that meet at the AA level. A “site” needs to be 5 pages >> minimum (and for testing purposes it is ideal to have it not be much >> larger). These can be sites found in the wild or demonstration sites, >> but >> they need a public URI and need to be available through June. >> - Another evaluator for Knowbility >> - Another evaluator for A11yrules >> >> >> >> AAA >> >> - 1-2 sites that meet at the AAA level. A “site” needs to be 5 pages >> minimum (and for testing purposes it is ideal to have it not be much >> larger). These can be sites found in the wild or demonstration sites, >> but >> they need a public URI and need to be available through June. >> - Another 1-2 evaluators for lflegal.com >> >> >> >> Implementations link: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG21/CR/implementations >> >> >> >> Found a site that looks promising? Submit it here ( >> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG21/CR/select_site) and start evaluating it! >> >> >> >> *We need to have 8 sites at AA and 2 at AAA, tested and confirmed to meet >> that conformance level by at least two people by Tuesday morning if we >> are >> to keep on schedule.* >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> AWK >> >> >> >> Andrew Kirkpatrick >> >> Group Product Manager, Accessibility >> >> Adobe >> >> >> >> akirkpat@adobe.com >> >> http://twitter.com/awkawk >> > -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2018 15:37:12 UTC