Re: Evaluation priorities

I've signed myself up to be the second evaluator for Nomesa... returning
Alastair the favour :)

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 4:44 PM, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org> wrote:

> On 02/04/2018 3:41 PM, Detlev Fischer wrote:
>
> Michael
> is there any easy way to see which ones have been picked up by tomorrwow
> morning CET
> I might be able to do another one but I’d rather be told which one to go
> for (if I choose, I might choose the same as someone else).
>
> It's not super-duper simple, but for the sites I listed, find them in the
> implementations page and look at the "evals" column. If the number is less
> than 2, the site definitely needs another evaluator. If the number is 2 or
> greater, you can follow the link to see a table with the evaluation
> results, which includes people who started an evaluation. If the results
> for some evaluators are looking sparse, and in particular if there aren't
> at least two results recorded for each SC, then the site still needs
> evaluation - though the evaluators who began may or may not still be
> planning to complete their evaluation soon. In a case like this I'd focus
> your efforts just on the SC that don't yet have two results recorded in
> that table.
>
> Michael
>
> Detlev
>
>
> Am 02.04.2018 um 04:00 schrieb Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>:
>
> I've gone through the evaluations people have done so far of sites to
> demonstrate implementation of WCAG 2.1. Thanks for all the work done so
> far. There's good progress, but some urgent stuff still to do and we're at
> the edge of the timeline. For sites that are now passing, we don't need
> additional evaluations (pending double-checking), and should focus our
> energy on the gaps. Please focus evaluation efforts right now *only *on
> sites to demonstrate 2.6.1 Motion Actuation, 3.2.6 Status Changes, and
> sites marked as AA or AAA conformance demonstrations (except CanAdapt which
> already has sufficient evaluation).
>
> The sites which particularly need evaluation right now are:
>
>    - A11YRules
>    - A11Y Wins
>    - Buecherhallen / 2.6.1 Motion Actuation
>    - Deque University Public
>    - Knowbility
>    - Law Office of Lainey Feingold
>    - Matterhorn Protocol
>    - Nomensa website
>    - NY Mayor's office for PWD
>
> Michael
>
>
>
>