Re: motion or scaling animations

One last question

What are the obligations of the authors if Browsers build this in? is this
passive voice text

"...can be disabled without preventing the action"

the new equivalent to "a mechanism is available..."?



Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:35 PM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:

> > I'm hoping to position the SC so it could be rolled into the next
> version at AA once more data comes in....
>
>
>
> Agreed, that data should help to scope it (or bolster the argument for the
> scope), but the SC text would have to change to support that.
>
>
>
>
>
> > I'm not going to fall on my sword over it... at AAA there are all sorts
> of things that are not practicable for many organizations...
>
>
>
> If the browser support improves this becomes quite practical, the
> fall-back (not-using those type of animations or adding an on-screen
> control) are less so.
>
>
>
> Anyway, are we happy with the SC text?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>