Re: Interaction of "zoom content" and vertical writing modes

I'd rather not add the vertical part... it's speculative, and comes at a
high cognitive load cost, unless someone brilliantly word smith's it.

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:

> *[Jason] Yes – they’re going to exist within the lifetime of WCAG 2.1,
> according to your own investigation, and should thus be handled in the SC.*
>
>
>
> AC: Well, I said it was possible but the browser support is not there yet,
> and we don’t know when that might work.
>
> Where there is vertical text at the moment, it is on pages with vertical
> scrolling.
>
>
>
> Given that, I’d rather not complicate it. Just trying makes my head hurt,
> you end up with something like this:
>
>
>
>
>
> For pages that scroll vertically by default, content can be zoomed to an
> equivalent width of 320 CSS pixels without loss of content or
> functionality, and without requiring horizontal scrolling.
>
>
>
> For pages that scroll horizontally by default, content can be zoomed to an
> equivalent height of 320 CSS pixels without loss of content or
> functionality, and without requiring vertical scrolling.
>
>
>
> Except for parts of the content which require two-dimensional layout for
> usage or meaning.
>
>
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>