Re: Revert Adapting text language replacing "adapt" with "change"

Hi Steve, Andrew, Jason, and all,

Thank you, Steve!  At one time we did use the word "set" in some of
the proposals.

Can anyone not live with Steve's proposal:

"If the technologies being used allow the user agent to set text style
properties, then no loss of essential content or functionality occurs
by setting all of the following:"

To replace the November 13 wording:

"If the technologies being used allow the user agent to change text
style properties, the following can be achieved with no loss of
essential content or functionality: "

Kindest Regards,
Laura

On 11/16/17, Repsher, Stephen J <stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com> wrote:
> Alright, how about just using "set" as the verb then...
>
> "If the technologies being used allow the user agent to set text style
> properties, then no loss of essential content or functionality occurs by
> setting all of the following:"
>
> That should fix that problem, but I'm inclined to say we need the word
> "only" in there somewhere given the discussion even amongst ourselves had to
> reiterate it.  I had tossed that in there a while back but not sure why it
> was removed and would have to check the GitHub thread.
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: White, Jason J [mailto:jjwhite@ets.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 10:44 AM
> To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>; Andrew Kirkpatrick
> <akirkpat@adobe.com>
> Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>; David MacDonald <david@can-adapt.com>;
> Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
> Subject: RE: Revert Adapting text language replacing "adapt" with "change"
>
> I remain concerned that David's proposal doesn't address Andrew's case in
> which no "change" is necessary, because the content already meets the four
> requirements listed in the SC. I suppose one could say that there's a
> trivial null transformation involved (i.e., no change could still be treated
> as a "change"), which is however counter-intuitive and a very subtle -
> indeed dubious - interpretation of the text.
>
> I'm leaning toward saying, no, I can't live with David's revert.
>
> Perhaps "ensuring all of the following" would be better, where "ensuring"
> includes either changing or leaving alone if the author has already met the
> specified thresholds.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Laura Carlson [mailto:laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 10:05 AM
>> To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
>> Cc: White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org>; WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>; David
>> MacDonald <david@can-adapt.com>; Alastair Campbell
>> <acampbell@nomensa.com>
>> Subject: Re: Revert Adapting text language replacing "adapt" with
>> "change"
>>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> Text at the end of our November 13, 2017 meeting:
>>
>> "If the technologies being used allow the user agent to change text
>> style properties, the following can be achieved with no loss of
>> essential content or
>> functionality:
>> * the 4 things
>>
>> David's proposed revert [5]:
>>
>> "If the technologies being used allow the user agent to change text
>> style properties, then no loss of essential content or functionality
>> occurs by changing all of the following:"
>> * the 4 things
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Kindest Regards,
>> Laura
>>
>> [5]
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists
>> .w3.o
>> rg%2FArchives%2FPublic%2Fw3c-wai-
>> gl%2F2017OctDec%2F0368.html&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C700
>> b333d209b412a9c1a08d52d03766a%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%
>> 7C0%7C0%7C636464415244080402&sdata=696nDSdTQHKxkuSw3lWGUqVOSX6
>> eR8l86ZDq3Vgw47Q%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> On 11/16/17, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote:
>> > Laura,
>> > I’m sure that the options were clearly laid out somewhere in the
>> > thread, but I don’t have time to find it. Can you clearly lay out
>> > “before” and “proposed” options?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > AWK
>> >
>> > Andrew Kirkpatrick
>> > Group Product Manager, Accessibility Adobe
>> >
>> > akirkpat@adobe.com
>> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwit
>> > te
>> >
>> r.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C700b333d209b412
>> a9c1a
>> >
>> 08d52d03766a%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C63646
>> 4415244
>> >
>> 080402&sdata=kszdaxRJsWVstas19rZOJnWmR3UB7bdcevZEcLFajJg%3D&reserv
>> ed=0
>> >
>> > On 11/16/17, 09:56, "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >     Hello everyone,
>> >
>> >     I wrote:
>> >     > Andrew, Jason, and everyone else, can you live with reverting the
>> >     > adapting text language by replacing "adapt" with "change" as
>> > David
>> >     > suggested? [5]
>> >
>> >     Please let me rephrase that.
>> >
>> >     After reviewing the video demonstration, draft technique, and test
>> >     results can anyone not live with reverting the adapting text
>> > language
>> >     by replacing "adapt" with "change" to what David suggested?
>> >
>> >     Thank you.
>> >
>> >     Best Regards,
>> >     Laura
>> >
>> >     On 11/15/17, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >     > Hello Andrew, Jason, and all,
>> >     >
>> >     > Andrew wrote [1]:
>> >     >> It would help me to understand exactly what steps you
>> > envision a user
>> >     >> would need to
>> >     >> follow to achieve the following four items, and provide an
>> > example page
>> >     >> that shows
>> >     >> this working as you envision it.
>> >     >
>> >     > Alastair provided a video demonstration of what a person would
>> > need to
>> >     > do to test for the four items on the BBC and Adobe
>> > homepages.[2] Thank
>> >     > you, Alastair!
>> >     >
>> >     > For that step-by-step process in text, please check our draft
>> >     > technique "Allowing for Spacing Override". [3]
>> >     >
>> >     > For results of the testing that we completed using that
>> > step-by-step
>> >     > procedure, please check the "Results of Bookmarklet Tests for
>> > Issue
>> >     > 78".[4] Between July 25 and August 3, 2017, 67 pages were tested.
>> > If
>> >     > the spacing parameters supplied by the author already meets or
>> > exceeds
>> >     > the SC's specified metrics, the content passes the test using the
>> >     > bookmarklet.
>> >     >
>> >     > Does the video demonstration, draft technique, and test results
>> >     > provide the clarity needed?
>> >     >
>> >     > Andrew, Jason, and everyone else, can you live with reverting the
>> >     > adapting text language by replacing "adapt" with "change" as
>> > David
>> >     > suggested? [5]
>> >     >
>> >     > Thank you.
>> >     >
>> >     > Kindest Regards,
>> >     > Laura
>> >     >
>> >     > [1]
>> >
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists
>> .w3.o
>> rg%2FArchives%2FPublic%2Fw3c-wai-
>> gl%2F2017OctDec%2F0370.html&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ca5e5bb7503ee418633
>> a508d52d023100%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636
>> 464409791358570&sdata=DIMiABzs3Pd1HEAQZI5t%2FQxTAeaXeqyT%2FCwpbB
>> %2FNnZE%3D&reserved=0
>> >     > [2]
>> >
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists
>> .w3.o
>> rg%2FArchives%2FPublic%2Fw3c-wai-
>> gl%2F2017OctDec%2F0373.html&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ca5e5bb7503ee418633
>> a508d52d023100%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636
>> 464409791358570&sdata=03fGYgLdaQfwsqHHd0EmAIZloK5iSz3E%2B3NWWLN
>> 3QEY%3D&reserved=0
>> >     > [3]
>> >
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.
>> org%2FWAI%2FGL%2Fwiki%2FAllowing_for_Spacing_Override&data=02%7C01
>> %7C%7Ca5e5bb7503ee418633a508d52d023100%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c
>> 178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636464409791358570&sdata=NejhMNltxv0VwBtv1jIK
>> s90MuWL39OtfN21DaTPf3X8%3D&reserved=0
>> >     > [4]
>> >     >
>> >
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.
>> org%2FWAI%2FGL%2Fwiki%2FResults_of_Bookmarklet_Tests_for_Issue_78&da
>> ta=02%7C01%7C%7Ca5e5bb7503ee418633a508d52d023100%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34
>> 438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636464409791358570&sdata=tc9Wjhg3
>> 1KL11sE1TGIKLkx7ghxQtbgnkWbqS3Clcmg%3D&reserved=0
>> >     > [5]
>> >
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists
>> .w3.o
>> rg%2FArchives%2FPublic%2Fw3c-wai-
>> gl%2F2017OctDec%2F0368.html&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ca5e5bb7503ee418633
>> a508d52d023100%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636
>> 464409791358570&sdata=hNH%2BJRMlEOz9uzbU8JpGlnmg49MxnU8n19Y0JRd
>> Grp4%3D&reserved=0
>> >     >
>> >     > --
>> >     > Laura L. Carlson
>> >     >
>> >
>> >
>> >     --
>> >     Laura L. Carlson
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Laura L. Carlson
>
> ________________________________
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it
> is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in
> error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take
> any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it
> from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
>
>
> Thank you for your compliance.
>
> ________________________________
>


-- 
Laura L. Carlson

Received on Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:55:13 UTC