RE: CFC - NEW Proposed definition for 'Programatic Notification'

+1 I agree easier to read

Sorry a bit of a query… should it be 'Programmatic Notification'?


Best wishes
E.A.

Mrs E.A. Draffan
WAIS, ECS , University of Southampton
Mobile +44 (0)7976 289103
http://access.ecs.soton.ac.uk<https://www.outlook.soton.ac.uk/owa/redir.aspx?C=69b1RzNTDwem3wbm4pLRmuYfTLt16YjcghtEpZBsF5Sebx78I2DUCA..&URL=http%3a%2f%2faccess.ecs.soton.ac.uk%2f>
UK AAATE rep http://www.aaate.net/<https://www.outlook.soton.ac.uk/owa/redir.aspx?C=WUwOCw_4FszLSzcUbkoFdDkad8-Q_GrRfPYUJ_ol5l2ebx78I2DUCA..&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.aaate.net%2f>

From: Mike Elledge [mailto:melledge@yahoo.com]
Sent: 19 October 2017 14:12
To: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>; WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Cc: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>; ALAN SMITH <alands289@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: CFC - NEW Proposed definition for 'Programatic Notification'

+1  Reads better!

On Tuesday, October 17, 2017 4:08 PM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca<mailto:david100@sympatico.ca>> wrote:

+1

Cheers,
David MacDonald

CanAdapt Solutions Inc.
Tel:  613.235.4902
LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
twitter.com/davidmacd<http://twitter.com/davidmacd>
GitHub<https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
www.Can-Adapt.com<http://www.can-adapt.com/>

  Adapting the web to all users
            Including those with disabilities

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 2:23 PM, ALAN SMITH <alands289@gmail.com<mailto:alands289@gmail.com>> wrote:
+1

Alan Smith

From: Joshue O Connor<mailto:josh@interaccess.ie>
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 1:09 PM
To: WCAG<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: CFC - NEW Proposed definition for 'Programatic Notification'

Call For Consensus — ends Friday October 20th at 1:00pm Boston time.

The Working Group has a proposed change to SC 2.6.2 Orientation [1]

from:

" Content is not locked to a specific display orientation, and functionality of the content is operable in all display orientations, except where display orientation is essential for use of the content."

to

"Content is operable in all display orientations supported by the user agent, except where display orientation is essential".

Original Github issue can be viewed here: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/ issues/70<https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/commit/b5c68e17f82feb0cdbbafc273f245b136a7445c4>

This was discussed on todays call: https://www.w3.org/2017/10/17- ag-minutes.html#item03<https://www.w3.org/2017/10/17-ag-minutes.html#item03>
If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

[1] https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/# orientation<https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#orientation>

Thanks
--
Joshue O Connor
Director | InterAccess.ie