- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:41:20 +0100
- To: Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On 18/10/2017 16:36, Detlev Fischer wrote: > In my view, the SC text should *not* refer to a mechanism if only for reason that it will give developers the idea that introducing controls for locking / unlocking on the content level might be a smart idea. KISS! But if the outcome of having a control that locks/unlocks/sets orientation results in users being able to use the content, and the end result is accessible/solves the problem that the SC wants to address, then it should be a valid approach, no? P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Wednesday, 18 October 2017 15:41:44 UTC