Re: Issue #171: Does WCAG need to consider feasibility

+1 to closing the issue.

JF

On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Repsher, Stephen J <
stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com> wrote:

> I propose we close issue #171:
>
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/171
>
>
>
> In short, I reviewed the entire thread and this seems mostly a general
> reaction to the FPWD rather than useful comments on the feasibility of
> individual SC.  Given this and the fact that the current editor’s draft is
> much different than the FPWD, we should close this and maintain focus on
> potential implementability concerns with individual criteria.  I also think
> the suggestion to move everything to AAA or declare 2.1 not an official
> version per the original comment is contradictory to our charter.
>
>
>
> *Steve Repsher*
>
> Twitter <https://twitter.com/steverep> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/steverepsherjr/> | GitHub
> <https://github.com/steverep>
>
>
>



-- 
John Foliot
Principal Accessibility Strategist
Deque Systems Inc.
john.foliot@deque.com

Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion