Re: Proposed answer to AGWG comment issue 373 (A mechanism is "easily available")

Yes and we could add a "should" to the understanding document to discuss
the preference for "easy"

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de
> wrote:

> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/373
>
> Proposed answer:
>
> In line to the proposal to deal with issue #375 I propose to remove The
> tem 'easily' in the new Success Criterion 2.2.7 Interruptions (Minimum)
> which starts "A mechanism is easily available to postpone and suppress
> interruptions ...
>
> Others in the discussion have noted that the term 'easily'  is "widely
> interpretable and person-dependent" and therefore not testable.
>
> After the change the SC text would then read:
>
> "A mechanism is available to postpone and suppress interruptions and
> changes in content, unless they are initiated by the user or involve an
> emergency."
>
> --
> Detlev Fischer
> testkreis c/o feld.wald.wiese
> Thedestr. 2, 22767 Hamburg
>
> Mobil +49 (0)157 57 57 57 45
> Fax +49 (0)40 439 10 68-5
>
> http://www.testkreis.de
> Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites
>
>
>
>