Re: Compromise on Numbering: Changing 11 AAA numbers solves the level problem

ditto -1

> On 18 Sep 2017, at 23:32, James Nurthen <james.nurthen@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> While I appreciate the thinking behind this I will vote a strong -1 to changing numbers - even at AAA level.
> 
> 
> 
>> On 9/18/2017 2:08 PM, Katie Haritos-Shea wrote:
>> I hate changing numbers, but, a thoughtful option. + 1 to new Speech GL and Pointer GL.
>> 
>> Katie Haritos-Shea
>> 703-371-5545
>> 
>> On Sep 18, 2017 4:58 PM, "David MacDonald" <david@can-adapt.com> wrote:
>> The current problem is that new Level SCs come in after AAA in thenstandard unless we jugle the order or deemphise number, neither of which is ideal.
>> 
>> Here's a proposal that might work as a compromise. 
>> 
>> Level AAA SCs are less entrenched in the WCAG culture. What if we agree that those numbers can change.
>> 
>> - Change 11 Level AAA SC numbers
>> - Insert the new SCs in their proper place
>> - move accidental activation to Pointer Guideling as per Steve's suggestion Issue #376
>> - Make new Speech guideline 2.7
>> 
>> This would allow the numbers to make sense with the levels also in order, so no Level A or AA would follow AAA, and would keep ALL Level A and AA SC numbers in tact. 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> David MacDonald
>>  
>> CanAdapt Solutions Inc.
>> Mobile:  613.806.9005
>> LinkedIn 
>> twitter.com/davidmacd
>> GitHub
>> www.Can-Adapt.com
>>   
>>   Adapting the web to all users
>>             Including those with disabilities
>> 
>> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards, James
> <oracle_sig_logo.gif>
> James Nurthen | Principal Engineer, Accessibility
> Phone: +1 650 506 6781 | Mobile: +1 415 987 1918 | Video: james.nurthen@oracle.com 
> Oracle Corporate Architecture
> 500 Oracle Parkway | Redwood Cty, CA 94065 
> <green-for-email-sig_0.gif> Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment