Regarding issue issue #376

I've reviewed the comment which is asking the group to consider having one
definition of pointer events rather than having references to the first
version of pointer events any other definition point to the second. Patrick
explained that the new pointer events version is in first public working
draft. And if it's possible to reference that, given that it's moving
towards full acceptance, that would be preferable.

I agree with that sentiment. I don't see any logistical reason why we can't
reference the latest definition, as long as it's consistent and will not
change. I think even if it undergoes minor changes there's very little risk
of it becoming a problem for our definition of pointer events.

I would like to propose that we reference the latest version of pointer
events for all references, and close the issue.

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>