Re: Editorial changes to SC

Ok, I could live with re-introducing the comma after "functionality", 
but think it's important to keep the comma I introduced before "except 
for..." because that should clearly be a separate clause.

Would this go back to "editorial" territory if I do that?

Michael


On 08/09/2017 4:04 AM, Alastair Campbell wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> Generally that looks good, but I think the very last change in the 
> list (zoom-content, line 12) changes the meaning, at least according 
> to a comment previously.
>
> “Content can be zoomed to an equivalent width of 320 CSS pixels 
> without loss of content or functionality*,* and without requiring 
> scrolling on more than one axis except for…”
>
> The comment stretched my grammar knowledge, but apparently if there is 
> no comma after ‘functionality’ it means you could have a loss of 
> content with scrolling, but not functionality.
>
> The content & functionality are supposed to be grouped, with the 
> no-scrolling applying to both.
>
> I’m happy to be corrected on that, but I think Michael Gower commented 
> about it previously.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -Alastair
>