Re: CFC - Device Sensors

+1 -- I'd be happy

Sent from phone

> Am 26.08.2017 um 13:55 schrieb Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>:
> 
> Thanks Patrick, yes, I'd be happy to see that. Do others agree to this approach? 
> 
> Thanks 
> 
> Josh
> 
> InterAccess - Accessible UX
> 
> -------- Original message --------
> From: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
> Date: 26/08/2017 12:27 (GMT+00:00)
> To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
> Subject: Re: CFC - Device Sensors
> 
> On 26/08/2017 10:44, Joshue O Connor wrote:
> [...]
> > So, I'm concerned that if we do not now get wider review we risk 
> > throwing the baby out with the bathwater. I'm actually not comfortable 
> > taking the opportunity for wider review when what seems like an 
> > interesting/progressive SC is on the table.
> 
> Any chance of adding a prominent editorial note in the draft pointing 
> out that the exact wording is under review due to potential scope issues?
> 
> P
> -- 
> Patrick H. Lauke
> 
> www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
> http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
>