Re: AAA SC for coga

For provide support: issues/32 <https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/32>

Perhaps this can be rolled into 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions, in the
understanding.



Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:58 PM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
wrote:

> For the plain language SC  issues/41
> <https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/41>
>
> We could possibly leverage the language at the front of 4.1.1 Where it
> says "In content implemented using markup languages, "
>
> Perhaps we could say :"In content implemented using the English language"
>
> Or
>
> "In content implemented using latin based languages"
>
> Or some other finite group of languages to which these "rules" are known
> to be effective
> ​.
>
> I'm not a linguist and I don't know if these rules are actually always
> indicated, nor do I know to which languages they could be applied ... but
> this might be a way to get the SC into the standard at AAA​
>
>
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>
>
>
> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
>
> Tel:  613.235.4902 <(613)%20235-4902>
>
> LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>
> twitter.com/davidmacd
>
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>
> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>
>
>
> *  Adapting the web to all users*
> *            Including those with disabilities*
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:47 PM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>
>> I think symbols could be a low hanging fruit for AAA
>>
>> >A mechanism is available such that controls that are used to reach, or
>> are part of, a critical service, and each instruction that contains important
>> information that directly relates to a critical service, is preceded by
>> a symbol or picture, which relates to the topic of the control or
>> instruction.
>>
>> Critical Service:
>>
>> service that is needed to prevent significant harm, risk or loss such as:
>> significant financial loss, illness, injury or deterioration in a patient's
>> condition or effective loss of rights or freedoms
>>
>> Note: I would drop "or effective loss of rights or freedoms".  I think
>> that is an ever evolving term and not stable like the rest of the list.
>> (perhaps it could be revised narrower to "allocation of self determination"
>> or something similar.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> David MacDonald
>>
>>
>>
>> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
>>
>> Tel:  613.235.4902 <(613)%20235-4902>
>>
>> LinkedIn
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>>
>> twitter.com/davidmacd
>>
>> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>>
>> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>>
>>
>>
>> *  Adapting the web to all users*
>> *            Including those with disabilities*
>>
>> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
>> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 2:32 PM, White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I think all of the proposals cited below, in their current form, have
>>> significant issues which are independent of the level assignment. Thus, I
>>> wouldn’t recommend any of them for inclusion in a draft as they currently
>>> stand, whether at level AAA or at another level.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> However, it may be possible to turn one or more of them into a clearly
>>> written, focused, reliably testable proposal. I won’t try to guess which
>>> ones would be easiest to revise adequately; in general, they have
>>> difficulties that lack obvious solutions. The difficulties aren’t related
>>> to the kinds of issues that determine whether a proposal belongs at Level
>>> AAA or not. Based on a quick reading, Minimize user Errors seems to be more
>>> precisely defined than the rest, but even it has issues that we’ve
>>> discussed in the past and which remain in what seems to be the latest
>>> version in GitHub.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It would be worth comparing with David MacDonald’s list of proposals
>>> that he thinks are on track to possible inclusion.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com]
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 25, 2017 1:09 PM
>>> *To:* W3c-Wai-Gl-Request@W3. Org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>>> *Cc:* White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org>
>>> *Subject:* AAA SC for coga
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Folks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> please could you take a look and see if you think the following success
>>> criteria can get though at AAA? It wpould be realy helpful to have your
>>> feedback as soon as possible so we can prioritize what to put forward.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> plain language - enhanced: issues/41
>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag21%2Fissues%2F41&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C0c7d1efa39b349dd2f7608d4d37fe74a%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636365993671200910&sdata=owDbh5ALfpQckQUgZkPk5%2BGczoQSaq5y5%2F5e4bOZtHU%3D&reserved=0>
>>>
>>> symbols: issues/50
>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag21%2Fissues%2F50&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C0c7d1efa39b349dd2f7608d4d37fe74a%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636365993671200910&sdata=rqtgaWFs25TWgI2PjkdDQk15qM9wM6mtZ9xH%2FzmmyZY%3D&reserved=0>
>>>
>>> provide support: issues/32
>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag21%2Fissues%2F32&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C0c7d1efa39b349dd2f7608d4d37fe74a%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636365993671200910&sdata=ZfwH1pAfs4CvuXpBaVuMZKItyL7vu%2FYU1znkzfVr5%2FQ%3D&reserved=0>
>>>
>>> minamize user errors: issue 13
>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag21%2Fissues%2F13&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C0c7d1efa39b349dd2f7608d4d37fe74a%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636365993671200910&sdata=VWndI7lxy17BH9V3fChguLIc6j9JGWIJrKZsx%2Brq0ys%3D&reserved=0>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We also have support personlization at AAA which is also very important
>>> (issue 309
>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag21%2Fissues%2F309&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C0c7d1efa39b349dd2f7608d4d37fe74a%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636365993671200910&sdata=%2B1SZrExdY9Szm3%2Fed0mu7WtGO0zJson26KUpDa4TG3c%3D&reserved=0>)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> All the best
>>>
>>> Lisa Seeman
>>>
>>> LinkedIn
>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fil.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Flisaseeman%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C0c7d1efa39b349dd2f7608d4d37fe74a%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636365993671200910&sdata=SXiB4KukrNsr6xG%2FItjTcjBIw7K%2BjCFhcnmlvZkDTl4%3D&reserved=0>,
>>> Twitter
>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2FSeemanLisa&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C0c7d1efa39b349dd2f7608d4d37fe74a%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636365993671200910&sdata=MUYQpMu0GxDKD2GoU7YePArUCnDisezVkZUR0dYb%2FcY%3D&reserved=0>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
>>> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom
>>> it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail
>>> in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or
>>> take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete
>>> it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
>>>
>>> Thank you for your compliance.
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>
>>
>