Re: CFC Conformance changes

+1

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 3:49 AM, Christopher Loiselle <loiselles@me.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> Thank you,
> Chris Loiselle
>
>
> On Jul 18, 2017, at 03:07 PM, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> +1
>
> Kindest Regards,
> Laura
>
> On 7/18/17, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> Call For Consensus — ends Thursday July 20 at 3:00pm Boston time.
>
>
> The Working Group has reviewed and approved changes in the conformance
>
> criteria section for inclusion in the Editor’s Draft, with the goal of
>
> obtaining additional input external to the working group.
>
>
> Survey results:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/62-63-71-conformance/results
>
> Call minutes: https://www.w3.org/2017/07/18-ag-minutes.html#item03
>
>
> The new SC can be reviewed here, in the context of the full draft:
>
> https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/62-63-71-conformance-changes/
> guidelines/#conformance-reqs
>
> (the change is that a 3rd note was added to the full pages conformance
>
> criteria.)
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
>
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being
>
> able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC
>
> deadline.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> AWK
>
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
>
> Adobe
>
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
>
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>
>
>
>
> --
> Laura L. Carlson
>
>


-- 
*Wilco Fiers*
Senior Accessibility Engineer - Co-facilitator WCAG-ACT - Chair Auto-WCAG

Received on Wednesday, 19 July 2017 08:03:56 UTC