Re: CFC: Standing consent to publish working drafts on monthly schedule

I agree Gregg. I do not support this direction. 

> On Mar 29, 2017, at 23:21, Gregg C Vanderheiden <greggvan@umd.edu> wrote:
> 
> public working draft for comment?
> every month? 
> 
> You will get the same comments over and over.   I would not publish another for comment until you have cleared all the comments from last time.
>  
> 
> To keep publishing new versions when the comments have not been cleared from the last is not good practice and not considerate of reviewers. 
> I do not understand the rationale
> 
> why would we want more comments before we have cleared the ones we have? 
> 
> 
> Maintaining and editors draft on the WAI/GL site is fine.    But publishing one for comment that has known problems that have not been addressed  - -I don’t see the logic in.  And I see lots of downsides. 
> 
> 
> Gregg
> 
> 
> Gregg C Vanderheiden
> greggvan@umd.edu
> 
> 
> 
>> On Mar 29, 2017, at 9:41 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote:
>> 
>> There have been a couple of questions, so we would like to clarify this CFC.
>> 
>> The intent is that the internal editor’s draft will be posted as a Working Draft on the monthly schedule reference below in the original CFC email. The approval is to allow the chairs and Michael to take the current version of the editor’s draft as of a day or two before the publication date and use that to create the Working Draft for comment.  
>> 
>> People who follow the group’s work on GitHub can comment anytime, including on the Editor’s draft, but the publication of the Working Draft will show progress and provide a current public version to solicit comments against.
>> 
>> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> AWK
>> 
>> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
>> Adobe 
>> 
>> akirkpat@adobe.com
>> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>> 
>> From: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>
>> Date: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 at 12:44
>> To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>> Subject: CFC: Standing consent to publish working drafts on monthly schedule
>> Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>> Resent-Date: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 at 12:45
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Call For Consensus — ends Thursday March 30th at 1:30pm Boston time.
>> 
>> On the call today we discussed a suggested a monthly publishing schedule for our working draft.
>> You can review the schedule here. [1]
>> 
>> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.
>> 
>> [1] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.1_timeline
>> -- 
>> Joshue O Connor
>> Director | InterAccess.ie 
>