Re: Editorial updates in WCAG 2.1 publication prep

I don't know of an orange that passes without getting into brown territory.

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>
wrote:

> Ø   The orange borders for proposals are now red and pass the color
> contrast test;
>
>
>
> Red says something different to me than orange.  Were we not able to find
> an orange that had sufficient contrast?
>
>
>
> Ø  Nobody complained about this, but the "Principle", "Guideline", and
> "Success Criterion" at the start of headers, and the "Level" in the
> conformance level indicator, are no longer CSS generated content. However,
> in the TOC those
>
>
>
> I’ve noticed this in other W3C documents.  I had noticed a lot of other
> content was missing when viewed in IE as well – but then I read Github was
> no longer supporting IE so I assumed it must have been me.  But we should
> consider how people might view the document in different browsers like IE.
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
> *From:* Michael Cooper [mailto:cooper@w3.org]
> *Sent:* Friday, February 24, 2017 2:48 PM
> *To:* AG WG
> *Subject:* Editorial updates in WCAG 2.1 publication prep
>
>
>
> A couple editorial issues that people raised on the list and I changed for
> the publication:
>
>    - The orange borders for proposals are now red and pass the color
>    contrast test;
>    - The instructions in the intro more clearly indicate that they are
>    indicated as "[Proposed]" with brackets, which now works as a search term
>    for people wanting to find them that way;
>    - There's a brief clause pointing out that there are also proposed
>    definitions to look at;
>    - Nobody complained about this, but the "Principle", "Guideline", and
>    "Success Criterion" at the start of headers, and the "Level" in the
>    conformance level indicator, are no longer CSS generated content. However,
>    in the TOC those words are not used (just the section numbers) because of
>    how the W3C stylesheets rendered it. I'll work on solving that for future
>    publications.
>
> Some of these changes are not in the rawgit because they required manual
> edits to the snapshot that will be published. I'll try to get the github
> versions up to snuff soon, it will require a little script work.
>
> Michael
>