Re: Coga SC inclusion in wcag 2.1

Steve,
I’m not clear on what you are saying. You said "We should have consensus especially for those coga SCs that address a essential user need” and I agree completely. This is a standards organization and we need to achieve consensus to publish content as the work of the group. But I get the sense that you are suggesting that we should publish SC that we don’t have consensus on – can you clarify?

Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility
Adobe

akirkpat@adobe.com
http://twitter.com/awkawk


From: Steve Lee <steve@opendirective.com<mailto:steve@opendirective.com>>
Date: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 11:35
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Subject: Coga SC inclusion in wcag 2.1
Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 11:35

ALl

I understand from Lisa that as things stand SC that do not meet all the acceptance criteria will be left out of this draft, without consensus.

I'm not happy with that! We should have consensus especially for those coga SCs that address a essential user need.

What needs to be done to ensure they are all included. I think lisa suggested ll should be in the draft at the end of the month. Thats sounds like a sensible idea to me. so I +1 it

thanks

Steve Lee
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com