- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 19:51:55 +0000
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On 07/02/2017 19:33, White, Jason J wrote: [...] > */[Jason] I’m comfortable with omitting from this first draft anything > that has not reached the stage of development at which circulating it > for external review is appropriate. I expect proposals to be added to > and deleted from drafts as the WCAG 2.1 effort proceeds, just as > occurred with WCAG 1.0 and 2.0 when they were under development./* > > */I think it would be highly undesirable to expect everyone to bring > their proposals to the point at which external review is desirable in > time for releasing a first public working draft. Let’s simply avoid that > kind of pressure. I know participants in this group are working hard as > it is./* > > */I am also concerned that giving public reviewers a large number of > proposals of varying quality to respond to could (1) create negative > impressions of the work over-all, and (2) overwhelm reviewers with > issues without obtaining focused comments on proposals that the working > group considers ready for wider circulation and comment./* > > */Consider this a statement in favor of a more focused first public > working draft to which additional proposals can be added as the work > progresses./* Agree with Jason's take on this. P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2017 19:52:19 UTC